Utah Oil and Gas Lease Auction Protested, Legal Deal Struck
SALT LAKE
CITY, Utah, December 19, 2008 (ENS) - Today, in front of the Bureau of Land Management headquarters in Salt Lake
City, more than 100 demonstrators braved the wind and cold hoping their protest could save some of Utah's prime wilderness
lands from destruction for oil and gas development.
Inside, the BLM was auctioning off 131 parcels of land
for oil and gas leases, but the protesters were not allowed in.
At the sale, the BLM sold 116 of the 131 offered parcels,
totaling 148,598 acres of federal land located in Carbon, Duchesne, Emery, Garfield, Grand, San Juan and Uintah Counties.
Leases on the parcels were sold between $10 and $200 dollars an acre for a total of $7.47 million.
 |
Oil rig in Utah (Photo courtesy Utah BLM) |
Near
the end of the auction, two registered bidders were detained by Bureau of Land Management Special Agents. An investigation
is being conducted by the BLM and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for Utah into the possibility that federal offenses were
committed by these bidders in an apparent effort to impede the bidding process to prevent others from bidding.
Late
last night in a legal protest of the lease sales that may save 100,000 acres of the most vulnerable wilderness, an agreement
between the BLM and a coalition of environmental and preservation groups was filed in federal court in Washington, DC.
The
deal will temporarily prevent the BLM from issuing leases on 80 contested parcels of Utah wilderness, including land adjacent
to three national parks, for 30 days, until January 19.
The coalition on Wednesday filed a lawsuit in federal court
in the District of Columbia seeking an injunction to stop the lease auction.
Although BLM went forward with the auction
today, the agency has agreed not to issue the contested leases. This will give federal court Judge Ricardo Urbina in Washington,
DC time to hear the case.
The environmental and preservation groups filing the case include - Earthjustice, Grand Canyon
Trust, National Parks Conservation Association, National Trust for Historic Preservation, the Natural Resources Defense Council,
Sierra Club, the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, and the Wilderness Society.
In a joint statement today, they said,
"Our legal actions have delayed today's transfer of pristine Utah wilderness, but the fight is not over. We will
get our day in court with BLM, and we will do all we can to protect Utah's unspoiled landscapes."
"Yet
President [George W.] Bush can still do something to save these areas. He can take Utah's unprotected wilderness off the
auction block for good. This is not a mess that should be left to the Obama administration," the groups declared.
In
their lawsuit, the groups decribe the damage that they are trying to prevent. "Development of these leases will degrade
air quality at Arches National Park, Canyonlands National Park and Dinosaur National Monument. It will lead to construction
of well pads, pipelines and roads in some of Utah's most impressive wilderness quality landscapes such as the Desolation
Canyon wilderness character area ... one of the largest roadless areas in the lower forty-eight states."
"These
activities will also harm Nine Mile Canyon, an area that BLM describes as 'the longest outdoor art gallery in the world'
because of its substantial concentration of prehistoric archeological sites and rock art," the lawsuit states.
These
lands were made available to industry in late October and early November through six resource management plans that will affect
three million acres of public lands.
The plaintiff groups argue that these plans were hastily approved so the leases
could be sold before President-elect Barack Obama takes office on January 20, 2009.
"The Bush administration has
rushed to get these leases out the door," said Sharon Buccino, senior attorney for NRDC. "In their midnight maneuvering,
BLM failed to complete the analysis required by federal law for the protection of America's natural and cultural treasures."
Polar bears dying
out in Russian region: expert
MOSCOW (AFP) – Polar bears are dying out in the remote Arctic region of Chukotka
because of melting ice and increased killing by humans, an expert with the International Fund for
Animal Welfare warned on Friday.
"If
this tendency continues, the population will disappear very quickly, said Nikita Ovsyanikov, a researcher from Wrangel
Island natural park in Chukotka who has spent the past 18 years studying polar bears in the region.
"We need to create new protected areas in the Arctic,"
said Ovsyanikov, who has conducted research on behalf of IFAW.
The shrinking of the Arctic ice sheet is forcing more bears to live on land in the summer where they often
have trouble finding food, which means they have to go into villages to scavenge and are more likely to be shot, he said.
Polar bear furs are also becoming increasingly popular in Russia, where the killing of polar
bears is strictly forbidden except for self-defence. IFAW estimates around 100 polar bears are killed illegally in Russia
every year.
There are a total of around 22,000
polar bears in the Arctic. Five thousand of them live between Chukotka and the US state of Alaska and are being forced further
and further north because of the melting ice, IFAW said
Tar Wars
Canadian
tar sands becoming top oil source, despite environmental harm
With conventional
oil reserves declining around the world, all eyes are turning to Canada, where tar sands in the north contain 175 billion
barrels of proven oil reserves -- almost in the neighborhood of Saudi Arabia's 262 billion and far more than the Arctic
Refuge's 10 billion. Getting saleable oil from tar sands is an expensive and environmentally devastating process involving
strip mining, burning the oil off the slag with natural gas, and refining the resulting heavy oil into lighter oil. But with
oil hovering above $50 a barrel, tar-sand oil is looking more attractive to many; China, for instance, is aggressively making
investments and deals with the Canucks. There are protests from the indigenous communities whose land is being used for mining
or pipelines, and from environmentalists horrified by the intensive production of greenhouse gases. "But there is no
minister of the environment on earth who can stop this from going forward, because there is too much money in it," said
Stephane Dion, Canada's, uh, minister of the environment. “From the Daily Grist”
Straight to the source: San Francisco Chronicle, Robert Collier, 22 May 2005
Northwest power managers struggle with electricity surplus
The Northwest is awash in electric
power this spring. Rivers are swollen. Columbia River dams are running full bore. Wind farm blades are spinning.
That should be good news for the Northwest,
where hydropower is cheap and wind a leader in renewable energy. It also should be good news for California, a huge electricity
consumer that often sucks up Oregon's springtime surplus.
But
a doubling of wind-power supplies and an unusually concentrated surge in water levels have challenged this season's power
operations like never before.
"You throw a spiky late
runoff into the equation, and a little extra wind, and it definitely gets interesting," said Kieran Connolly, a power
manager for Bonneville Power Administration.
The result: wasted power generation, excessive spill through
the dams and a sometimes frenzied juggling of dam and transmission schedules.
High water levels benefit power supplies and migrating fish, but the levels
in recent weeks have been too much of a good thing.
Oregon and Washington can't use all the electricity that's available. And southbound
transmission lines that are at capacity can't take the extra power California consumers otherwise would eagerly devour.
In some cases, power producers
are paying customers to take electricity off their hands.
Operators
of the Columbia-Snake River dams say there's enough give-and-take in the system to handle large fluctuations in water
flow and wind generation. But pressures have steadily increased, and they'll intensify as more and more wind power comes
into play.
"I wouldn't say it's totally under
control," Connolly said, "but we're keeping up at this point."
The limits snapped into focus a month ago, when warm weather finally arrived and mountain snow melts poured
into Northwest rivers.
River levels rise every spring, usually
beginning in March or April and lasting until late June. This year, cool weather persisted until a mid-May heat wave.
"Then everything started running," said Rick Pendergrass, BPA's manager
of power and operations planning.
Only in the past week did
the dousing begin to ease. Overall, the region expects a close-to-normal water year.
BPA, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation manage 14 major dams on the Columbia and Snake Rivers. They face a slew of requirements, from meeting electricity demand
to protecting fish to preventing floods.
When water levels
jump as quickly as they did this season and are squeezed into a short time, the difficulties close in.
For one thing, reservoir capacity is limited, so system operators can't store
all the extra water that flows downriver. They can't allow flooding, either, so they turn to the dams' turbines and
spillways to even things out.
For another, they can't generate
power any time they want. They must have a market for the megawatts. Because electricity demand in the region ebbs in the
spring -- the heat's turned off and so are the air conditioners -- high water can quickly become a resource without an
outlet via the turbines.
That leaves the spillways, which divert
flows around the dams' turbines. The corps manages spills in the spring to help juvenile salmon migrate downriver. If
releases are too powerful, dissolved gas in the water can rise to dangerous levels and give fish a potentially lethal condition
akin to the diver's disease called the bends.
Every day
since May 16, the corps has spilled water at volumes that exceed state criteria for water quality and salmon protection. That's
an unusually long time. Measurements of total dissolved gas have climbed during those spills but haven't gone high enough
to harm the fish, corps officials said.
Trade-offs between
power generation and spill can produce strange arrangements.
The
Grant County Public Utility District, which owns Priest Rapids and Wanapum dams on the upper Columbia in Washington, had too much water to safely spill and too
little demand for all the power the hydro turbines could produce. So it created a market by giving out, not taking in, revenue.
"You juggle resources as best you can," said Kevin
Nordt, Grant County PUD's director of power management. "If you have electricity but no one needs it, sometimes you
have to pay someone to take it."
These deals by a number
of Northwest utilities meant prices -- which reflect the cost to the buyer -- sometimes fell into negative territory on the
Mid-Columbia trading hub.
Meanwhile, prices in California remained
considerably higher, seesawing with the weather and accompanying demand. Northwest utilities might have tapped that market,
but high-voltage transmission lines heading south often were full.
Another variable also has blown in to challenge the system: the wind.
Wind-turbine capacity in the Columbia Gorge has doubled in the past year, bringing clean energy onto the grid but more
stress to dam operations. The thermal winds that whip through the river corridor crank up in the spring -- the very time Columbia
River flows peak.
BPA is responsible for blending wind power
into the grid. Each hour, wind farm operators give the agency their best forecasts of the megawatts to come. BPA uses the
schedules to anticipate changes in hydro generation, then deals with last-minute variations as they occur.
Hydro is considered a good complement to wind because its generation is relatively
easy to manipulate. Still, with so many demands on the system and wind's precise velocity impossible to predict, BPA has
found itself scrambling to keep the system in balance.
Several
weeks ago, when an unexpected wind surge hit, McManus said he came close to telling wind developers he couldn't take the
generation that exceeded the forecast. "So far, we haven't had to do that."
McManus is part of an effort to improve the way wind power joins the system. Dramatic changes must
be made within several years, he said. "If normal operations continue, we'll have a hard time meeting (electricity)
reliability standards. We're busting our tails. We don't have a lot of time."
-- Gail Kinsey Hill; gailhill@news.oregonian.com
|
|
| AP Photo: This image from March 6, 2008, released by the British Antarctic Survey, shows part of... |
Western Antarctic ice chunk collapses
By SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer Tue Mar 25, 11:04 PM ET
WASHINGTON - A chunk of Antarctic ice about seven times the size of Manhattan suddenly collapsed,
putting an even greater portion of glacial ice at risk, scientists said Tuesday.
Satellite
images show the runaway disintegration of a 160-square-mile chunk in western Antarctica, which started Feb. 28. It was the
edge of the Wilkins ice shelf and has been there for hundreds, maybe 1,500 years.
This is the result of global
warming, said British Antarctic Survey scientist David Vaughan.
Because scientists noticed satellite images within hours, they diverted satellite cameras
and even flew an airplane over the ongoing collapse for rare pictures and video.
"It's an event we don't get to see very often," said Ted Scambos, lead scientist
at the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder,
Colo. "The cracks fill with water and slice off and topple... That gets
to be a runaway situation."
While icebergs
naturally break away from the mainland, collapses like this are unusual but are happening more frequently in recent decades,
Vaughan said. The collapse is similar to what happens to hardened glass when it is smashed with a hammer, he said.
The rest of the Wilkins ice shelf, which is about the size of Connecticut, is holding
on by a narrow beam of thin ice. Scientists worry that it too may collapse. Larger, more dramatic ice collapses occurred in
2002 and 1995.
Vaughan had predicted the Wilkins
shelf would collapse about 15 years from now. The part that recently gave way makes up about 4 percent of the overall shelf,
but it's an important part that can trigger further collapse.
There's still a chance the rest of the ice shelf will survive until next year because this is the end of the
Antarctic summer and colder weather is setting in, Vaughan said.
Scientists said they are not concerned about a rise in sea level from the latest event, but say it's a sign
of worsening global warming.
Such occurrences are
"more indicative of a tipping point or trigger in the climate system," said Sarah Das, a scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute.
"These are things that are
not re-forming," Das said. "So once they're gone, they're gone."
Climate in Antarctica is complicated and more isolated from the rest of the world.
Much of the continent is not warming and some parts are even cooling, Vaughan said.
However, the western peninsula, which includes the Wilkins ice shelf, juts out into the ocean and is warming. This is the
part of the continent where scientists are most concern about ice-melt triggering sea level rise.